tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27560921.post115223657417665843..comments2007-02-13T17:27:32.900-08:00Scoobie Davisnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27560921.post-1153954192162097182006-07-26T15:49:00.000-07:002006-07-26T15:49:00.000-07:00<I>She wrote 100,000 sentences in the book</I><BR/><BR/>She did? Must be awfully thick.<BR/><BR/>The book, not Ann.<BR/><BR/>Well, maybe both.Realisthttp://pinkchimp.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27560921.post-1152251917973458392006-07-06T22:58:00.000-07:002006-07-06T22:58:00.000-07:00She wrote 100,000 sentences in the book and you lamers cite 3 sentence fragments about some trivial facts she referenced?<BR/><BR/>Weak stuff.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27560921.post-1152249111902894652006-07-06T22:11:00.000-07:002006-07-06T22:11:00.000-07:00"...this could be a tipping point."<BR/><BR/>It won't be.<BR/><BR/>I'm reminded of a few years ago, when a local talk radio host was caught plagiarizing for his online commentaries. Instead of owning up to it, or even denying it, he attacked the accuser. Only someone with no life would care about such things.<BR/><BR/>The host is still on the air, ratings higher than ever. Those people don't care about plagiarism (they can't even spell it, though I bet they could copy it from someone else).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com